Skip to main content

Box 2-HairLossProd

 Container

Contains 13 Results:

"A Clinical Trial of Foltene" by Dr. Hincky

 File — Box: 2-HairLossProd, Folder: 1
Scope and Contents From the Series: Material in this series relates to the injunctions brought against hair growth product and clinics by Upjohn for deceptive practices. This was done because Upjohn was working on a product (Rogaine) that was scientifically proven to treat male pattern baldness and did not want to face competition that did not hold to these standards. Most of the material is prior to August 1988 when Rogaine was approved by the FDA and includes legal memoranda, motions, petitions, correspondence, as well as...
Dates: 1887-2001

Foltene Communications Study

 File — Box: 2-HairLossProd, Folder: 2
Scope and Contents From the Series: Material in this series relates to the injunctions brought against hair growth product and clinics by Upjohn for deceptive practices. This was done because Upjohn was working on a product (Rogaine) that was scientifically proven to treat male pattern baldness and did not want to face competition that did not hold to these standards. Most of the material is prior to August 1988 when Rogaine was approved by the FDA and includes legal memoranda, motions, petitions, correspondence, as well as...
Dates: 1887-2001

Foltene Correspondence, January-June 1987

 File — Box: 2-HairLossProd, Folder: 3
Scope and Contents From the Series: Material in this series relates to the injunctions brought against hair growth product and clinics by Upjohn for deceptive practices. This was done because Upjohn was working on a product (Rogaine) that was scientifically proven to treat male pattern baldness and did not want to face competition that did not hold to these standards. Most of the material is prior to August 1988 when Rogaine was approved by the FDA and includes legal memoranda, motions, petitions, correspondence, as well as...
Dates: January-June 1987

Foltene Correspondence, July-December 1987

 File — Box: 2-HairLossProd, Folder: 4
Scope and Contents From the Series: Material in this series relates to the injunctions brought against hair growth product and clinics by Upjohn for deceptive practices. This was done because Upjohn was working on a product (Rogaine) that was scientifically proven to treat male pattern baldness and did not want to face competition that did not hold to these standards. Most of the material is prior to August 1988 when Rogaine was approved by the FDA and includes legal memoranda, motions, petitions, correspondence, as well as...
Dates: July-December 1987

Hair Loss Products Advertisements

 File — Box: 2-HairLossProd, Folder: 5
Scope and Contents From the Series: Material in this series relates to the injunctions brought against hair growth product and clinics by Upjohn for deceptive practices. This was done because Upjohn was working on a product (Rogaine) that was scientifically proven to treat male pattern baldness and did not want to face competition that did not hold to these standards. Most of the material is prior to August 1988 when Rogaine was approved by the FDA and includes legal memoranda, motions, petitions, correspondence, as well as...
Dates: 1887-2001

Hair Loss Products Articles

 File — Box: 2-HairLossProd, Folder: 6
Scope and Contents From the Series: Material in this series relates to the injunctions brought against hair growth product and clinics by Upjohn for deceptive practices. This was done because Upjohn was working on a product (Rogaine) that was scientifically proven to treat male pattern baldness and did not want to face competition that did not hold to these standards. Most of the material is prior to August 1988 when Rogaine was approved by the FDA and includes legal memoranda, motions, petitions, correspondence, as well as...
Dates: 1887-2001

Hair Loss Products Information

 File — Box: 2-HairLossProd, Folder: 7
Scope and Contents From the Series: Material in this series relates to the injunctions brought against hair growth product and clinics by Upjohn for deceptive practices. This was done because Upjohn was working on a product (Rogaine) that was scientifically proven to treat male pattern baldness and did not want to face competition that did not hold to these standards. Most of the material is prior to August 1988 when Rogaine was approved by the FDA and includes legal memoranda, motions, petitions, correspondence, as well as...
Dates: 1887-2001

Hair Loss Products Memorandum and Legal Recommendations, 1987

 File — Box: 2-HairLossProd, Folder: 8
Scope and Contents From the Series: Material in this series relates to the injunctions brought against hair growth product and clinics by Upjohn for deceptive practices. This was done because Upjohn was working on a product (Rogaine) that was scientifically proven to treat male pattern baldness and did not want to face competition that did not hold to these standards. Most of the material is prior to August 1988 when Rogaine was approved by the FDA and includes legal memoranda, motions, petitions, correspondence, as well as...
Dates: 1987

Hair Loss Products Memorandum and Legal Recommendations, first draft, 1987

 File — Box: 2-HairLossProd, Folder: 9
Scope and Contents From the Series: Material in this series relates to the injunctions brought against hair growth product and clinics by Upjohn for deceptive practices. This was done because Upjohn was working on a product (Rogaine) that was scientifically proven to treat male pattern baldness and did not want to face competition that did not hold to these standards. Most of the material is prior to August 1988 when Rogaine was approved by the FDA and includes legal memoranda, motions, petitions, correspondence, as well as...
Dates: 1987

Headstart Hair Care

 File — Box: 2-HairLossProd, Folder: 10
Scope and Contents From the Series: Material in this series relates to the injunctions brought against hair growth product and clinics by Upjohn for deceptive practices. This was done because Upjohn was working on a product (Rogaine) that was scientifically proven to treat male pattern baldness and did not want to face competition that did not hold to these standards. Most of the material is prior to August 1988 when Rogaine was approved by the FDA and includes legal memoranda, motions, petitions, correspondence, as well as...
Dates: 1887-2001